http://www.casablancacar.com/speaker-terminal-subwoofer/
Thanks for visiting Casablanca Car your source for Speaker Terminal Subwoofer !We hope you will find the
Speaker Terminal Subwoofer information that you seek.
 |
 Alpine V power Amp  US $67.00
|
 Kicker 12 SoloBarics L7 1500 Watt Subwoofer w SubZone vented box Grill US $249.99
|
 4 Pair Speaker Enclosure Subwoofer Box Made In USA R T Enterprise US $15.95
|
 Alpine MRP M500 Car Amplifier US $145.00
|
| Powered by phpBay Pro |
which subwoofer is better?
1) Energy EW-100
- 55W RMS rating; 225W peak power rating
- 10" down-firing woofer
- Bass reflex design via rear-mounted port
- Frequency response: 29Hz to 120Hz ± 3dB
- Class A/B discrete MOSFET Amplifier output
- Fiber-composite cone
- Two line-level/LFE RCA phono inputs
- Two high-level speaker terminals
- Dimensions: 13.5" W x 15.5" H x 13.5" D
- Weight: 29 lbs
-$150.00
2) Polk PSW10
-50W RMS rating; 100W Dynamic
-10" front firing woofer
-Vented via front panel flared port
-Polymer Composite cone
-Speaker level, line level inputs
-Frequency Responce 35Hz - 200Hz
-14-3/8" H x 14" W x 16-1/8" D
-Weight 26.00 lbs.
-$100.00
The Energy sub is probably slightly superior. Assuming the specs are accurate, it has significantly better frequency response on the low end (i.e., it can put out lower bass frequencies than the Polk), which should enhance your movie-watching experience. And though my sub is front-firing, all things being equal, I tend to prefer down-firing subs. It also looks like the Energy has a solid Amp, while the Polk specs don't mention what type of amp it has.
